Fascism

So, here it is. Short and to the point. Immigration is a force of nature. And fascism is an artificial occurrence.

There's no need to consider immigration a result of fascism, or worse converses, or that of anything at all. It is, instead, a force of nature. It's not binary in either direction, but instead separate and integrated. It is an artificial occurrence in areas like Mexico, making it controllable. Mexican drug cartels are often disorganized and biologically inhibited. Thus, the question is not when will a threat arise, but how to use an array (programming) of options [O1, O2, O3, O4, O5] to cope with the threat. Increased border security checkpoints, Border Patrol and Customs, integration processes, new laws for legal immigrants to sales funnel Mexican immigration the right way, and to discourage, or selectively remove, a series of threats that pervade American jails today. So, the problem though artificial does not remain in Mexico. Thus, the question should not be answered. However, to look at it broadly, it's easy to see that high GDP offerings to 320 million people at 60,000 per capita is appetizing enough to abide by the rule of law, and to observe order (but not to look at it with vision).

Fascism is not created by a hard rule of thumb. Immigration is likewise not solved easily either. One is artificial, The other is natural. Thus, one has to define the type of fascism one wants to experience in a country before deciding to analyze it; like a science experiment, it's wisest to let in a bull in order to test its strength with multiple individuals waving flags left right and center. One action cannot happen without the other. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that if time is a function, the input should be gentle. The output can be proportionately valuable, largely through monetary value (for those who like context) and the output can also be proportionately useful, which means more direct translation through the function (A--> B instead of 2A = B, or A = C).