It's reasonable to say that the Venetian plant can have whatever it wants. Bienvenido.
Friday, April 5, 2019
Defense Against, For, or With Fascism
There are several different divs and classes of Marines, from special forces to delta to ranger. The question is often which serves as the ultimate defense against fascism, when it appears in an area like Mexico. For drug king pins, that'd be delta or the navy, with the ranger coming in to clean up. However, for a drug war, considering other variables, the only way to counter would be to strategize the externalities first, and then internalize (not psychological), or integrate and compute, information flow. Stack flow can occur, and this is something many specialists recognize. A light, targeted, electromagnetic pulse through Mexico City is enough to send in special forces for a mission. However, the army is too well advertised for this to be laser targeted. Air missions aren't needed. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the best way to handle the southern border careful evaluation of a box. In a box, you can put things in it, and if it's made with steel or microfibers, it can mold like a black hole, slow time, and effectively concentrate on growing what it needs to destroy. A beautiful Venetian fly trap could be, instead of presented, be grown from within the box. Watered appropriately, there is no need for pesticide or insecticide or Orange. This is not Vietnam. The question remains is how close are we to Mexico, and how close are we to its neighbors? They are receivers of news, not producers of it. They have of course an Al Jazeera, which is an American channel, but that's a channel, not a medium. What size does a Venetian plant have to be? How strong are its components, and does it need to have roots?
Monday, April 1, 2019
Fascism
So, here it is. Short and to the point. Immigration is a force of nature. And fascism is an artificial occurrence.
There's no need to consider immigration a result of fascism, or worse converses, or that of anything at all. It is, instead, a force of nature. It's not binary in either direction, but instead separate and integrated. It is an artificial occurrence in areas like Mexico, making it controllable. Mexican drug cartels are often disorganized and biologically inhibited. Thus, the question is not when will a threat arise, but how to use an array (programming) of options [O1, O2, O3, O4, O5] to cope with the threat. Increased border security checkpoints, Border Patrol and Customs, integration processes, new laws for legal immigrants to sales funnel Mexican immigration the right way, and to discourage, or selectively remove, a series of threats that pervade American jails today. So, the problem though artificial does not remain in Mexico. Thus, the question should not be answered. However, to look at it broadly, it's easy to see that high GDP offerings to 320 million people at 60,000 per capita is appetizing enough to abide by the rule of law, and to observe order (but not to look at it with vision).
Fascism is not created by a hard rule of thumb. Immigration is likewise not solved easily either. One is artificial, The other is natural. Thus, one has to define the type of fascism one wants to experience in a country before deciding to analyze it; like a science experiment, it's wisest to let in a bull in order to test its strength with multiple individuals waving flags left right and center. One action cannot happen without the other. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that if time is a function, the input should be gentle. The output can be proportionately valuable, largely through monetary value (for those who like context) and the output can also be proportionately useful, which means more direct translation through the function (A--> B instead of 2A = B, or A = C).
There's no need to consider immigration a result of fascism, or worse converses, or that of anything at all. It is, instead, a force of nature. It's not binary in either direction, but instead separate and integrated. It is an artificial occurrence in areas like Mexico, making it controllable. Mexican drug cartels are often disorganized and biologically inhibited. Thus, the question is not when will a threat arise, but how to use an array (programming) of options [O1, O2, O3, O4, O5] to cope with the threat. Increased border security checkpoints, Border Patrol and Customs, integration processes, new laws for legal immigrants to sales funnel Mexican immigration the right way, and to discourage, or selectively remove, a series of threats that pervade American jails today. So, the problem though artificial does not remain in Mexico. Thus, the question should not be answered. However, to look at it broadly, it's easy to see that high GDP offerings to 320 million people at 60,000 per capita is appetizing enough to abide by the rule of law, and to observe order (but not to look at it with vision).
Fascism is not created by a hard rule of thumb. Immigration is likewise not solved easily either. One is artificial, The other is natural. Thus, one has to define the type of fascism one wants to experience in a country before deciding to analyze it; like a science experiment, it's wisest to let in a bull in order to test its strength with multiple individuals waving flags left right and center. One action cannot happen without the other. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that if time is a function, the input should be gentle. The output can be proportionately valuable, largely through monetary value (for those who like context) and the output can also be proportionately useful, which means more direct translation through the function (A--> B instead of 2A = B, or A = C).
Mark Zuckerberg and The Surface Net
All,
With respect to greater ideas, Internet is the new medium for communication and conveying of ideas, of respecting countries and bringing them closer together, which sometimes can be a social media objective (Facebook). At what cost, and with what benefit, that answer remains with a question. This article will not cover that question.
Thus, and therefore, it's reasonable to assume that the preponderant evidence to the contrary indicates a need for bigger government. Free markets serve the greater good of taxation, which, despite whatever antiquated Objectivist view old Republicans used to have, thus, it is easy to assume that free markets thrive at the will or lack thereof of government. Free markets exist to sate its need for information, to serve as many different things, all of which help in various ways for government to thrive economically, militarily, domestically, internationally.
The more time it takes for the free market to serve government correctly, the better off the free market will be. Government is safe for those who abide by John Locke's social contract: there are rules, and you will heed their reason. It is no longer a 13 state colony, at least here in the US. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the people are happiest with a hybrid "Lin bao" consent rather than a Wei Ci game of hide and mouse. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that business serves as that agreement, as the conjunction developing good relations with people and allowing them to experience, to quote the Chinese, a "Cultural Revolution of the Internet" which will allow them to deliver suffering at the level required proportionately by government. Of course, with any change, especially from a DarkNet Internet to a Surface Net Internet, the question cannot be answered. It can only be discussed.
With enough time, that question can be answered. But first, it must be addressed. And even before then, one must reflect upon the function of time. What does time produce? Value. It produces value. It allows commodities to be sold and bought with equal exchange in Yen, Dollars, Euro, etc. Exchanged in the NASDAQ with proportionate variance relative to market need. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the COGS, or Cost of Goods Sold in a given market exceeds the expected ROI of clamps. It's reasonable to assume that in order for people to be paying taxes regularly from 2019-2023, it's reasonable to assume that the safest way to establish border security is to continue to develop those ties between nations, allowing servers to both serve and take, and subsequently be the server of government like a waiter is to management. The first premise to answering the initial question is not when, but "what is value?" And, "How does it serve government?" Akin to a voting system designed through cell phones where small amounts of trackable money are collected as donations in an election, technology serves as a means by which to serve that greater good of law and order, in which the law organizes the players and the order establishes the super structure of various things like the law, and it writes the social contract. Pearl Harbor was a threat to national sovereignty and border security, just like Mexico is a threat to Texan, New Mexican, and Californian sovereignty. California has according to a varied Internet source the largest population by state, seconded only by Texas. The south serves government through providing information and intel on the ground. Equivalent to organized terrorism, Mexico has developed into a uniquely hot location for immigration, customs, or even simple stuff like American tourism. Drug lords and kingpins rule the country and come close to the border-this may be because Mexico's GDP is lower than that of the US, which respectively sits at an average of 60,000 per capita. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that Mexico will not develop as well as the US because of its absence of either a function of time or a value output.
With respect to greater ideas, Internet is the new medium for communication and conveying of ideas, of respecting countries and bringing them closer together, which sometimes can be a social media objective (Facebook). At what cost, and with what benefit, that answer remains with a question. This article will not cover that question.
Thus, and therefore, it's reasonable to assume that the preponderant evidence to the contrary indicates a need for bigger government. Free markets serve the greater good of taxation, which, despite whatever antiquated Objectivist view old Republicans used to have, thus, it is easy to assume that free markets thrive at the will or lack thereof of government. Free markets exist to sate its need for information, to serve as many different things, all of which help in various ways for government to thrive economically, militarily, domestically, internationally.
The more time it takes for the free market to serve government correctly, the better off the free market will be. Government is safe for those who abide by John Locke's social contract: there are rules, and you will heed their reason. It is no longer a 13 state colony, at least here in the US. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the people are happiest with a hybrid "Lin bao" consent rather than a Wei Ci game of hide and mouse. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that business serves as that agreement, as the conjunction developing good relations with people and allowing them to experience, to quote the Chinese, a "Cultural Revolution of the Internet" which will allow them to deliver suffering at the level required proportionately by government. Of course, with any change, especially from a DarkNet Internet to a Surface Net Internet, the question cannot be answered. It can only be discussed.
With enough time, that question can be answered. But first, it must be addressed. And even before then, one must reflect upon the function of time. What does time produce? Value. It produces value. It allows commodities to be sold and bought with equal exchange in Yen, Dollars, Euro, etc. Exchanged in the NASDAQ with proportionate variance relative to market need. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the COGS, or Cost of Goods Sold in a given market exceeds the expected ROI of clamps. It's reasonable to assume that in order for people to be paying taxes regularly from 2019-2023, it's reasonable to assume that the safest way to establish border security is to continue to develop those ties between nations, allowing servers to both serve and take, and subsequently be the server of government like a waiter is to management. The first premise to answering the initial question is not when, but "what is value?" And, "How does it serve government?" Akin to a voting system designed through cell phones where small amounts of trackable money are collected as donations in an election, technology serves as a means by which to serve that greater good of law and order, in which the law organizes the players and the order establishes the super structure of various things like the law, and it writes the social contract. Pearl Harbor was a threat to national sovereignty and border security, just like Mexico is a threat to Texan, New Mexican, and Californian sovereignty. California has according to a varied Internet source the largest population by state, seconded only by Texas. The south serves government through providing information and intel on the ground. Equivalent to organized terrorism, Mexico has developed into a uniquely hot location for immigration, customs, or even simple stuff like American tourism. Drug lords and kingpins rule the country and come close to the border-this may be because Mexico's GDP is lower than that of the US, which respectively sits at an average of 60,000 per capita. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that Mexico will not develop as well as the US because of its absence of either a function of time or a value output.
App launch will involve a spectrum of musical integration and dissemination, reorganization and establishment of consistency, routine, and more. The idea is to get people to relax their minds into a non-thinking, Rapid-Eye Movement presence (state of wakefulness). Dubstep, "I Can't Stop," can be the initial.
Parsing data, separating, and by extension organizing, is the best way to handle the backlog of the app. It will allow for development of consumer behavior module analysis. Phishing data, a little different, will involve the use of an SEO in its initial replica in order to build, like most programmers who are entrepreneurs know, is the way that information is sent in a binary way (2 ways). Though that's the basics of email, it is also a good way to establish more complicated models of email like forwarding. Copying, preserving, or the result-sending-results in cause-effect, but not necessarily A leads to B.
A MAY LEAD to B, C, or D. Thus, A causes an algorithmic array. If email is used, there is inherent risk. Thus, apply due prudence at night between hours 12 and 6. No "Internet email" from 12 to 6. Needs to be closed, signed out of, and, perhaps, simplified.
With the increased presence of oversight on apps, this leads to a cross over problem. Immediate solutions:
Parsing data, separating, and by extension organizing, is the best way to handle the backlog of the app. It will allow for development of consumer behavior module analysis. Phishing data, a little different, will involve the use of an SEO in its initial replica in order to build, like most programmers who are entrepreneurs know, is the way that information is sent in a binary way (2 ways). Though that's the basics of email, it is also a good way to establish more complicated models of email like forwarding. Copying, preserving, or the result-sending-results in cause-effect, but not necessarily A leads to B.
A MAY LEAD to B, C, or D. Thus, A causes an algorithmic array. If email is used, there is inherent risk. Thus, apply due prudence at night between hours 12 and 6. No "Internet email" from 12 to 6. Needs to be closed, signed out of, and, perhaps, simplified.
With the increased presence of oversight on apps, this leads to a cross over problem. Immediate solutions:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)